Winged Foot Exclusive: A Look Inside the Open
With its figurative winged feet, Gourmet Golfwrx is everywhere. Walter Dagwood, a G.Gwrx contributing editor, made his way around the course for Tuesday's practice round and brings us an exclusive look behind the scenes at this year's U.S. Open Championship. Dagwood is no stranger to New York and is widely known for his cosmopolitan and golfaholic tendencies. Interested in seeing more of Dagwood? Let us know in the comments.
Enjoy!
A Look Inside The Open
by: Walter Dagwood 6/13/2006
Commentary on 'The Grounds'
The site of the US Open 2006 is a venue requiring the test of skill, patience and risk/reward. To no surprise, the USGA has taken a historic course, and through the redevelopment of Tom Fazio, and the characteristics of the Association, they have tweaked and modified the course to represent the very challenge indicative of its reputation.
This is my first PGA event in 15 years and my impressions are much different this year than when I was a 12 year old boy who never picked up a stick before. At an age when everything in life is
impressionable, the enormity of professional golfers tackling 400 yrd. par 4's seemed nearly impossible. Certainly the size of the course has grown, yet so have I.
To my surprise, my initial look at the course did not seem difficult. I walked the holes in order, followed a few groups of favorites and watched the Pro's attack the greens from various lengths and angles. As I stood at tee boxes visualizing holes or walking across fairways imagining my approach, I didn't feel the discomfort of being unmatched to a Major Championship course. But it was best once said, "The Devil is in the Details." And I suppose that's just what makes the US Open
so difficult.
ITS NOT WHAT YOU GOT AS MUCH AS WHERE YOU PUT IT
Yes, tees are lengthened and even a few holes are damn near impossible to get to in regulation. (Note: The 260 par 3 3rd or the 514 par 4 9th). But theres also a 162 yrd Par 3 which seemed, at first glance, attackable. Most holes dog leg (either left or right) yet unlike "tight" courses (lots of trees or 'jail' off the fairways), the trees don't seem to come into play too much. Oddly enough though, from the tips, it doesn't feel tight. But again, that's the mistake most players will make. If you let it out even a little, it will be costly. With the new USGA strategy "graduate rough" missing the fairway is all you need to make critical contention making mistakes.
BUSHWHACKED IN THE ROUGH
On the first hole I watched Vijay, Muthiya, and T. Armour III all attempt shots from the rough. (The first cut is comparable to average rough on your home course). Two more cuts in and you cant even see the ball let alone players shoe tops. Not one of them was able to get to the green from 165 out. Vijay tried a rescue club, but opted to aim 30+ yrds in front of the green. David Howell also played a few shots from the rough on the back nine, none of which successfully made it. The end result was to take your 'penalty' and throw a 8/9/W on the ball and pull it out of the rough and 100 yrds. (approx) down the fairway. At least from what I saw, it would take a feat of super-human strength to get home in two from the rough...and even then you probably aren't going to be happy.
LIKE A GLOVE
If the first trick is getting in the fairway, and the second staying out of the rough, then the third is Proximity to the Hole. The one advantage these players have is that most greens roll from back to
front. Furthermore, most greens are elevated a few feet off the ground, so it almost looks like pro's throwing lawn darts into the green. However, most greens are guarded with bunkers (mostly frontside) and there is heavy rough on the mid green and in back. Its tricky because you have to carry the bunkers in the front, but you have to be straight so that the ball can spin back. If you can do that, you can ACTUALLY score. But again, you can only get that approach if you are in the fairway!
SNEAKY SNEAKY
I suppose what makes the course most interesting is the difficulty of the greens. Its hard to gauge a green when you don't stand on it or get to putt a few. Plus, from the gallery, you are a little further
away than the fairway, so you cant actually see the subtleties. But if there is an advantage to having greens that roll back to front where you can aim long and pull it back, the advantage is lost once you look at birdie putts. Unlike Bethpage (another US Open favorite) there doesn't appear to be any straight putts. Everything will break....and most likely it will be fast. I suspect players fear let a ball roll by the hole, because they are too fast and going downhill, so stopping putts will be tough. I guess that means that the players wont be too aggressive with birdie putts.
STAT WORTHY NOTICE
I believe that the Stat that can win the US Open is the 'Total Driving' category. Total Driving is the combination of distance rank and accuracy rank. My choice is not to take anything away from Greens
in Regulation or Putts per round....both very important. But this course matters most when you are long off the tee and deathly accurate. Only 10 of the top 20 Tour Leaders in this category are competing this week...see anybody you know?
CONTENDERS AND PRETENDERS
Obvious choices would include the big 5. In fact, I believe there are only a handful of players who can win the major. But its worth noting some also-rans that could make noise of Champagne popping or a pig squealing.
CONTENDERS
Adam Scott- Scooter is long, he's a sniper and he's literally on fire. Some of the best golf of his career, this course plays to his strengths. 1st in All-Around on the TOUR I don't believe there is a
better golfer out there right now. Plus, with the confidence of last weeks win by the Socceroos, everything seems to be going right down under.
DL III- Its been awhile since crowd favorite Davis made a push in a major. With the exception of the Match Play, he hasn't even cracked the top 10 this year. But he is a major contender because of his
stats. He's long off the tee, deathly accurate to the greens (which leads to great putting avg.) and under 200yrds. he's 10th in proximity to the hole. Last year he finished 6th and shot 77 on Thursday. There's magic at Winged Foot for DL3. If he can keep it in the fairway, he'll be around Sunday.
David Howell- I feel obligated to pick a guy from across the pond. This guys got the best shot to be around on Sunday. He's got great control of his driver, he's the 2nd best putter on tour and 3rd in Birdie Avg. Plus, he played well at the Barclay's last week. And for record, he's the 2nd best Back-Nine scorer. If the rough doesn't beat you emotionally on the front-nine, this guy will on the back.
PRETENDERS
Fred Couples- Everyone loves Freddy Boom-Boom, but he's a liability off the tee. He's long, I will grant you, but his putter isn't what it use to and there's just no room for error in a US Open. There's no doubt that the Masters sets up better for his game, and he's only finished in the top 10 in the US Open twice in the past 15 years.
Sergio Garcia- Same thing goes for Sergio. He can't find the fairway off the tee and it will cost him dearly. For as good a player as he is, I doubt he makes the cut this week. Winged Foot is no place to get on an emotional roller coaster and I suspect he ends up breaking/throwing a club.
MY PICK

Its hard not to go out of the big 5 because each, in their own way, is a model of consistency...and that's the key to the US Open. Honestly, I have to believe that the Mickelslam is pulling into Mamaroneck. Based on categories mentioned before (6th all around, 18th in Total Driving, 1st in Putt Avg, GIR, Birdie Avg.) its truly hard not to believe he is in total control. 2 drivers control his ability to go left or right and that's perfect for doglegged Winged Foot. He is the number 1 scorer on the Front and Back Nine, so basically it boils down to nerves of steel....and this is Superman.
So that's the way I saw it at Winged Foot. It should be a great weekend with less flash and more consistency, but for a purist of the game, it doesn't get any better.
"The only way a man can remain consistent amid changing circumstances is to change with them while preserving the same dominating purpose."-
Winston Churchill

Add to: